PART 3 out of 4

|By Mylene Doublet O’Kane, Philosophy & History of Ideas, Teacher, writer, Israeli-French independent editorialist
|Editor’s note:
|The original source is the French language. This in-depth review is in 4 sections. The reader must be aware that once he has started to read, he may not stop. The philosophical analysis implies the claim of initial postulates which may not reflect the final conclusions.
|The author is an experienced teacher. She has developed a personal technique which favors understanding for both French |and English speakers.
|Sept, 2017
Author’s note:
This work was necessary to help the ordinary man connect the dots between the History of ideas, (Geo)-politics, ethics and the future of mankind. This is why nobody wanted to take the risk to write it. Hence, it is my personal honour and privilege to present this address, at a time when other thinkers in the West, among them the very greatest, are condemned to silence, thus to an exile from their fellow men.

Even if considering a balkanization of Syria and Iraq, the U.S.-led plan of regime change in Syria has miserably failed, resulting in Iran’s unprecedented influential role not only in the Middle East, but also in Central Asia with a new international key partner as robust as China.

Should I mention that China has recently joined a small club of nations which enjoy military bases outside of their respective sovereign territories? With legal basis, Beijing has indeed opened a facility in the East African state of Djibouti for highly significant reasons. With the United States already sowing conflicts in crucial spots along China’s One belt- One Road trade and commerce superhighways as well as on SCO*’s ones, with a view to creating breaches, divisions and ethnical tensions, it has become crucial for China to develop a military presence on strategic routes. Djibouti sits opposite Yemen on the African side of Bab-el-Mandeb; the strait which separates the Gulf of Aden from the Red Sea and, by extension, the Suez Canal. * SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization).

As of now, the Strait of Bab-el-Mandeb is under U.S./U.K.-backed Saudi naval blockade amid a proxy war against the Tehran project under which Iran has been gradually increasing its support for the Houthi rebels in Yemen for the past ten years. Beyond the result of a calamitous humanitarian crisis, the additional advantage could also conveniently threaten one of China’s major shipping routes to the Red Sea.

Bangladesh/ Myanmar

In the same way, tensions currently happening between Bangladesh and Myanmar reflect U.S. unimaginative strategy of destabilization along one of six corridors making up the BRI (Belt Road Initiative; China’s $8 trillion project aiming to build the Silk Road 2.0), namely the 2800 km Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar (BCIM) corridor which will link Kolkata in India with Kunming in China’s Yunnan province, via Dhaka (Bangladesh) and Mandalay (Myanmar). Crucial in this corridor, the central hub is Kyaukphyu Special Economic Zone (KSEZ) shall integrate an express railway and deep water port with the potential to turn Myanmar into a regional logistics hub irrigating in trade from neighboring Thailand and Laos.


With the U.S. Pentagon flexing its military muscles in the South China Sea and putting the Strait of Malacca (a crucial point for China’s oil supply) under close scrutiny, the $10 bn Sino-Myanmar pipeline’s project which shall run from the Bay of Bengal to China’s Yunnan province has become a vital component of China’s energy security. Under these circumstances, the U.S. strategy has planned to place Rakhine State (formerly Arakan State) under US/NATO protection as the most efficient effort to sabotage the construction of the final infrastructure. Myanmar’s Rakhine Sunni Muslim minority, commonly known as “the Rohingyas” unsurprisingly includes several western-backed radical groups such as Harakah al-Yaqin, the “Rohingya Salvation Army”. Under covered psy-ops, numerous local reports point to extremist techniques such as burning their own villages or killing their own people in order to incite violence. In addition, they have perpetrated brutal crimes against the local pacific Buddhist population with a view to creating very much expected counter attacks against ethnic Muslims all across the country. As a predictable consequence, the western media is in charge of drawing the international community’s attention on ‘ethnic cleansing against Muslim minorities’ whose responsibility point to the Burmese authorities.

Whereas Aung San Suu Kyi has been western iconic idol for her struggle for Burmese independence and for her courageous opposition to Myanmar’s military Junta for over two decades, after fifteen years spent under house arrest, the Nobel Prize winner now finds herself under ignominious and unprecedented western media lynching. This astonishing woman was not even entitled to see her husband before he passed away in England. She has dedicated her life to her country and to her incorrigibly naïve hopes in a true Democracy. She had a dream. She’s put her faith in a better world where justice could prevail. Her crime has not changed. She is still fighting for the truth. Quite ironically, the western block was never pursuing the same aim.

As of now, China has refused to support U.N. involvement in the western-orchestrated crisis. “The superior man understands what is right. The inferior man understands what will sell” – Confucius.

In conclusion, from a Cold war that has never ended to the ongoing U.S.-led so-called “Global War on terrorism” (GWOT), the objective was always the achievement of a colonialist policy on a human scale.

“Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment — that which they cannot anticipate.” Sun Tzu in “The Art of War”

2/ INTRODUCING A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE; BRI and a Gold-backed Silk Road and China Yuan Oil Futures

The U.S. hegemony has become increasingly uncertain and unpopular around the world, including in so-called allied countries. “The Federal Government debt is at an unmanageable $20 trillion with no end in sight”. Western Europe rolls out the red carpet to Chinese and to the Russian Presidents, Xi-Jinping and Vladimir Putin. Populations incrementally turn a supporting eye to the BRICS countries (Brazil/Russia/India/China/ South Africa) as a counter-model of a less and less thinly totalitarianism. The western financial model based upon individuals’ debts, speculation, Ponzi schemes and financial bubbles is exhausted. The class of Masters and western elites is extensively uncovered. The real economy is bled dry and ruined. Unfair competitiveness, giant oligopolistic markets and particular interests have driven the western world to inevitable meltdown, unless restless wars are perpetrated. In truth, the only factor keeping the dollar from a total collapse is the U.S. military-industrial complex and Washington’s deployment of revamped, though failed ideologies, throughout its various deceptive bodies of propaganda. As mentioned earlier, Mr. Rothschild is a wise animal. He’s almost left the sinking boat. He is not the only one. There is no “economic recovery”, because bankers have nothing to earn from the real economy. To describe a new alternative, I cannot find better words than those of F. William Engdahl, American Strategic Risk Consultant, and lecturer, best-selling author on oil, Geopolitics and Princeton University postgraduate in Politics. Therefore, I may extensively quote his remarkable work:

“The 1944 Bretton Woods international monetary system as it has developed to the present is become, honestly said, the greatest hindrance to world peace and prosperity. Now China, increasingly backed by Russia—the two great Eurasian nations—are taking decisive steps to create a very viable alternative to the tyranny of the US dollar over the world trade and finance. Wall Street and Washington are not amused, but they are powerless to stop it.

Shortly before the end of the Second World War, the US Government, advised by the major international banks of Wall Street, drafted what many mistakenly believe was a new gold standard. In truth, it was a dollar standard in which every other member currency of the International Monetary Fund countries fixed the value of their currency to the dollar. In turn, the US dollar was fixed then to gold at a value equal to 1/35th of an ounce of gold. At the time Washington and Wall Street could impose such a system as the Federal Reserve held some 75% of all world monetary gold as a consequence of the war and related developments. Bretton Woods established the dollar which then became the reserve currency of world trade held by central banks”.

Death Agony of a Defective Dollar Standard

“By the end of the 1960’s with soaring US Federal budget deficits from costs of the Vietnam War and other foolish spending, the dollar standard began to show its deep structural flaws. A recovered Western Europe and Japan no longer needed billions of US dollars for financing reconstruction. Germany and Japan had become world class export economies with higher efficiency than US manufacturing owing to a growing obsolescence of US basic industry from steel to autos and basic infrastructure. Washington should then have significantly devalued the dollar against gold in order to correct the growing world trade imbalance. Such dollar devaluation would have boosted US manufacturing export earnings and reduced the trade imbalances. It would have been a huge push for the real US economy. However for Wall Street banks it spelled huge losses. So instead, the Johnson and then Nixon administrations printed more dollars and in effect exported inflation to the world.

The central banks of especially France and Germany reacted to the deafness in Washington by demanding US Federal Reserve gold for their US dollar reserves at $35 per unce s in the Bretton Woods 1944 agreement. By August 1971 the redemption of gold for inflated US dollars had reached a crisis point where Nixon was advised by a senior Treasury official, Paul Volcker, to rip up the Bretton Woods system.

By 1973 gold was allowed by Washington to trade freely and was no longer the backing of a sound US dollar. Instead, an engineered oil price shock in October 1973 that sent the dollar price of oil higher by 400% in a matter of months, created what Henry Kissinger then called the petrodollar.

The world needed oil for the economy. Washington, in a 1975 deal with the Saudi monarchy, insured that Arab OPEC would refuse to sell one drop of their oil to the world for any currency other than US dollars. The value of the dollar soared against other currencies such as the German Mark or Japanese Yen. Wall Street banks were awash in petrodollar deposits. The dollar casino was open and running, and the rest of the world was being fleeced by it.

In my book, “Gods of Money: Wall Street and the Death of the American Century”, I detail how the major New York international banks such as Chase, Citibank and Bank of America used the petrodollars then to recycle Arab oil profits to oil-importing countries in the developing world during the 1970’s, laying the seeds for the so-called Third World Debt Crisis. Curiously, it was the same Paul Volcker, a protégé of David Rockefeller and Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan Bank, who this time, in October, 1979 as Chairman of the Fed, triggered the 1980s debt crisis by pushing Fed interest rates through the roof. He lied and claimed it was to nip inflation. It was to save the dollar and the Wall Street banks.

Today, the dollar is a strange phenomenon to put it mildly. The United States since 1971 has gone from being a premier industrial nation to a giant debt-bloated casino of speculation.

With Fed Funds interest rates between zero and one percent the past nine years—unprecedented in modern history—the major banks of Wall Street, the ones whose financial malfeasance and murderous greed created the 2007 Subprime crisis and its 2008 global financial Tsunami, set about to build a new speculative bubble. Rather than lend to debt-bloated cities for urgently-needed infrastructure or other productive avenues of the real economy, instead they created another colossal bubble in the stock market. Major companies used cheap credit to buy their own stocks back, thereby spurring the stock prices on Wall Street exchanges, a rise fed by hype and myths about “economic recovery.” The S&P-500 stock index rose by 320% since the end of 2008. I can assure you those paper stock rises are not because the real US economy has grown 320%.

American households earn less in real terms each year over decades. Since 1988 median household income has been stagnant amid steadily rising inflation, a declining real income. They must borrow more than ever in history. Federal Government debt is at an unmanageable $20 trillion with no end in sight. American industry has been closed and production shipped offshore, “outsourced” is the euphemism. Left behind is a high-debt, rotted out “service economy” where millions work two even three part-time jobs just to keep afloat.

The only factor keeping the dollar from total collapse is the US military and Washington’s deployment of deceptive NGOs around the world to facilitate plundering of the world economy.

So long as Washington dirty tricks and Wall Street machinations were able to create a crisis such as they did in the Eurozone in 2010 through Greece, world trading surplus countries like China, Japan and then Russia, had no practical alternative but to buy more US Government debt—Treasury securities—with the bulk of their surplus trade dollars. Washington and Wall Street smiled. They could print endless volumes of dollars backed by nothing more valuable than F-16s and Abrams tanks. China, Russia and other dollar bond holders in truth financed the US wars that were aimed at them, by buying US debt. Then they had few viable alternative options.” F. William Engdahl

A Viable Alternative Emerges

“Now, ironically, two of the foreign economies that allowed the dollar an artificial life extension beyond 1989—Russia and China—are carefully unveiling that most feared alternative, a viable, gold-backed international currency and potentially, several similar currencies that can displace the unjust hegemonic role of the dollar today.

For several years both the Russian Federation and the Peoples’ Republic of China have been buying huge volumes of gold, largely to add to their central bank currency reserves which otherwise are typically in dollars or euro currencies. Until recently it was not clear quite why.

For several years it’s been known in gold markets that the largest buyers of physical gold were the central banks of China and of Russia. What was not so clear was how deep a strategy they had beyond simply creating trust in the currencies amid increasing economic sanctions and bellicose words of trade war out of Washington. Now, it’s clear why.

China and Russia, joined most likely by their major trading partner countries in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), as well as by their Eurasian partner countries of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) are about to complete the working architecture of a new monetary alternative to a dollar world.

Currently, in addition to founding members China and Russia, the SCO full members include Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and most recently India and Pakistan. This is a population of well over 3 billion people, some 42% of the entire world population, coming together in a coherent, planned, peaceful economic and political cooperation.

If we add to the SCO member countries the official Observer States—Afghanistan, Belarus, Iran and Mongolia, states with expressed wish to formally join as full members, a glance at the world map will show the impressive potentials of the emerging SCO. Turkey is a formal Dialogue Partner exploring possible SCO membership application, as are Sri Lanka, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cambodia and Nepal. This, simply said, is enormous.”

BRI and a Gold-Backed Silk Road

“Until recently Washington think tanks and the Government have sneered at the emerging Eurasian institutions such as SCO. Unlike BRICS which is not made up of contiguous countries in a vast land-mass, the SCO group forms a geographic entity called Eurasia. When Chinese President Xi Jinping proposed the creation of what then was called the New Economic Silk Road at a meeting in Kazakhstan in 2013, few in the West took it seriously. The name officially today is the Belt, Road Initiative (BRI). Today, the world is beginning to take serious note of the scope of the BRI.

It’s clear that the economic diplomacy of China, as of Russia and her Eurasian Economic Union group of countries, is very much about realization of advanced high-speed rail, ports, energy infrastructure weaving together a vast new market that, within less than a decade at present pace, will overshadow any economic potentials in the debt-bloated economically stagnant OECD countries of the EU and North America. What until now was vitally needed, but not clear, was a strategy to get the nations of Eurasia free from the dollar and from their vulnerability to further US Treasury sanctions and financial warfare based on their dollar dependence. This is now about to happen.

At the September 5 annual BRICS Summit in Xiamen, China Russian President Putin made a simple and very clear statement of the Russian view of the present economic world. He stated, “Russia shares the BRICS countries’ concerns over the unfairness of the global financial and economic architecture, which does not give due regard to the growing weight of the emerging economies. We are ready to work together with our partners to promote international financial regulation reforms and to overcome the excessive domination of the limited number of reserve currencies.” To my knowledge he has never been so explicit about currencies. Put this in context of the latest financial architecture unveiled by Beijing, and it becomes clear the world is about to enjoy new degrees of economic freedom.”

China Yuan Oil Futures

“According to a report in the Japan Nikkei Asian Review, China is about to launch a crude oil futures contract denominated in Chinese yuan that will be convertible into gold. This, when coupled with other moves over the past two years by China to become a viable alternative to London and New York to Shanghai, becomes really interesting.

China is the world’s largest importer of oil, the vast majority of it still paid in US dollars. If the new Yuan oil futures contract gains wide acceptance, it could become the most important Asia-based crude oil benchmark, given that China is the world’s biggest oil importer. That would challenge the two Wall Street-dominated oil benchmark contracts in North Sea Brent and West Texas Intermediate oil futures that until now has given Wall Street huge hidden advantages.

That would be one more huge manipulation lever eliminated by China and its oil partners, including very specially Russia. Introduction of an oil futures contract traded in Shanghai in Yuan, which recently gained membership in the select IMF SDR group of currencies, oil futures especially when convertible into gold, could change the geopolitical balance of power dramatically away from the Atlantic world to Eurasia.

In April 2016 China made a major move to become the new center for gold exchange and the world center of gold trade, physical gold. China today is the world’s largest gold producer, far ahead of fellow BRICS member South Africa, with Russia number two.

China has now established a vast storage center in the Chinese Qianhai Free Trade Zone next to Shenzhen, the city of some 18 million immediately north of Hong Kong on the Pearl River Delta. Now China is completing construction of a permanent gold vault facility, including a bonded warehouse, trading floor and related offices areas. The 105-year-old Hong Kong-based Chinese Gold and Silver Exchange Society is in a joint project with ICBC, China’s largest state bank and its largest gold importing bank, to create the Qianhai Storage Center. It begins to become clear why Washington deceptive NGOs such as the National Endowment for Democracy tried, unsuccessfully, to create an anti-Beijing Color Revolution, the Umbrella Revolution in Hong Kong in late 2014.

Now to add the new oil futures contract traded in China in Yuan with the gold backing will lead to a dramatic shift by key OPEC members, even in the Middle East, to prefer gold-backed Yuan for their oil over inflated US dollars that carry a geopolitical risk as Qatar experienced following the Trump visit to Riyadh some months ago. Notably, Russian state oil giant, Rosneft just announced that Chinese state oil company, CEFC China Energy Company Ltd. just bought a 14% share of Rosneft from Qatar. It’s all beginning to fit together into a very coherent strategy.

The dollar imperium is in its painful death agony and its patriarchs are in reality denial otherwise known as the Trump presidency. Meanwhile the saner elements of this world are about building constructive, peaceful alternatives. They are even open to admit Washington, under honest rules, to join them. That’s remarkably generous isn’t it?”.

Countries in Europe such as Greece or France would benefit much more from this alternative. As an example, in the spring of 2016, the Greek government approved the deal for the sale of Piraeus port to China. COSCO (China Ocean Shipping Company) received 67% of its shares. The total volume of Chinese investment in Piraeus is expected to exceed USD 1 billion. It shall come as no surprise to the Europeans to learn that western bankers need NATO to support a crippled dollar by imposing continuous unauthorized, undeclared and unconstitutional wars. The only problem is that NATO is the means by which Europe destroyed itself from within.

In conclusion, there is not the shadow of a doubt that U.S.-led NATO war machine is about to go all-out war in central Asia and in the Middle East. To capture the wealth of these nations will be western bankers’ grim consolation. It is also of their personal interest to try to divide Russia, India and China and to balkanize as many nations as they can in these regions. Therefore, U.S.-orchestrated escalation of ethnic conflicts on all these borders is more than expected.

Naturally, the western media will focus on more fatalities of innocent people, while targeting Chinese and Russian economic and military partners for their lack of ‘democratic and humanistic’ behaviors. The scenario is already written. I can almost write the articles in advance. Previously mentioned countries which are interested in joining the “BRI and Gold Backed Silk Road” and “China Yuan Oil future” are going to endure ‘fire and fury’. The CIA and other western-led intelligence agencies are going to be particularly active. Meanwhile, thanks to WikiLeaks’ remarkable determination to let the truth out, the release of “Vault 7 – Year Zero” has allowed the public opinion to get a clear idea of their scandalous methods. It is extremely concerning to have to consider that in the 21st century, a confined human being embodies the last floating banner standing for a human right to knowledge. “No information, Knowledge!” once claimed Albert Einstein.

“It is only prudent never to place complete confidence in that by which we have even once been deceived”. René Descartes, in Méditations.

Julian Assange scores ten years of zero deception. The truth can never come from unsubstantiated narrative. Solid evidence must prevail. From this understanding, this is the reason why Alphabet [Google] has recently decided a Nazi ordering on, not only a worldwide class of servants, but on knowledge and this precise totalitarian move gives a clear indication of what western-led New World Order has concocted for the future of mankind.


I have said earlier that the current economic system which relies upon western financial speculation, USD currency manipulation and ever-growing individuals’ debts has now come to an end. After the life extended myth of post-Stalinism “Red Scare”, after the life extended myth of 2001 “Global War On Terrorism”, American coffers are empty and Fort Knox’s “Wealth of some 151 nations” has mysteriously plummeted. The U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio indicates investors that the country cannot disregard the problem of repaying its loans any longer, the first in line sacrificed debtors of which being the Baby Boomers. By far, they are indeed the biggest domestic investors via Social Security and other trust funds. If these funds are not propped up, 75 million Americans will be robbed of their hard-won retirement. In truth, recent administrations have mortgaged the legacy of a generation. Actually, since 1913 and the implementation of a private banking system, America was designed as a tool to live on wars and advances to ‘Allies’. How Social Security, which will soon have to pay Baby Boomer retirees their pensions, can make it? It cannot, unless all-out wars are launched and foreign investors are somehow forced to buy U.S. treasuries. Furthermore, as the debt-to GDP ratio increases, the nations may demand higher interest payments to compensate for the increased risk. We didn’t even reach that point. No serious investor wants to buy dollars anymore. Therefore, as the U.S. Government can no longer sustain Social Security and other programs, it is only fair to assume that the whole “House of cards” is now crumbling down. Currently, Social Security costs more than $1 trillion per year and payroll taxes no longer cover the funds. 80% of individuals’ tax incomes go to the Pentagon. Hence, Congress can no longer ‘borrow’ from Social Security trust Fund to pay for other Federal programs. For fiscal year 2018, the interest on the debt [thus not even the debt] is $315 bn. It will double over the next ten years (2027).

Consequently, the question arises of how to sell more to consumers who earn less? In order to thrive, the system must improve its trading opportunities. In other words, it must raise the level of production with an obvious consequential reduction of workers and of wages. At some point, this situation leads to an astonishing increase in unemployment for redundant jobs (destruction of repetitive task jobs) which are directly impacted by the new technological era.

At the same time, a population boom has risen in tandem with an unmanageable debt. Therefore, rational reasoning concludes that when the debt bubble bursts, which is what is about to happen in the United States, a correction in population has to be implemented. Hence, wars, destabilizations of Europe of Central Asia and the Far-East, western-backed Sunni terrorism coupled with further control of information [thus of propaganda] and the gradual removal of the redundant people who will have no function in the new technological era are under way. Undoubtly, this factuality is hard to face. Undeniably, it’s fundamentally cynical, but it is rational, and this is why Anglo-American Masters have opted for it. One may wish to draw an analogy with Machiavelli’s realism which separates politics and morals. To echo the argument, I shall only need to quote Stuart Hampshire for instance:

“Machiavelli argued that it was irresponsible and morally wrong to apply to political action the moral standards that are appropriate to private life and to personal relations: standards of friendship and of justice. If one refused to be ruthless in the pursuit of objectives of public policy, and refused to use deceit and guile as instruments of policy, one betrayed those who had put their trust in the person who represents them. (…) Machiavelli implied that morality in politics must be a consequentialist morality, and the ‘must’ here, marks a moral injunction”.

Consequentially then, if a collapsing western financial system continues to survive throughout speculation, disloyal financial tricks and wars, this new technological era may be very humanitarian in the end, but only for those who will survive its full implementation; namely the class of western Masters and a privileged group of specialists that improve, operate and maintain this new technology system which is in the hands of elites. As for the redundant “useless” class of servants, the new economic model may very well lead to Nazi methods of extermination which may include climatic fatalities, ecological destructions due to human dissemination of particles in variable stratospheric layers, micro weapons of mass destruction, namely nanobots whose inner capacity to swim in the bloodstream and to replicate are similar to bombs. The slight difference is this one: A bomb can line up in the air once. Nanobots can get into the human body through facial cream, vaccinations, air, water, soil, [therefore food] and can achieve whatever they were programmed to do. They may also absolutely get out of control during their process of self-duplication.


Of course, no western government can openly translate this grim vision without risking a major peril for the continuity of the State. Redundant people’s hope will more likely be entertained with this idea that new jobs will be created very soon or the narrative may more likely than not be coupled with an apparent emancipatory scenario of one having the tremendous and quite unique opportunity to become one’s own boss. It is said that the last thing that dies in a man is hope. Nevertheless, facts are facts. For a transitory period of time which should not exceed the next twenty years, a dispensable man is going to be forced to adapt to this revolutionary era and therefore, he may change jobs six, seven eight times.

The public opinion may be interested in reading and/or hearing about what Nicholas Negroponte, Founder and Chairman Emeritus of Boston MIT Media Lab has to say about Nanobots:

“How do you pretty directly interact with the human brain? Everybody who’s done that has done it through the outside, with sticking pins, needles or EEG, MEG or through pills. The last option was the best way thus far. But the higher way to control the human brain is from the inside, from the bloodstream because every time you take a breath, you bloodstream irrigates your capillaries, from head to toes. Hence, if you inject tiny robots into the bloodstream, they can get very close to all the cells and nerves. So, if you want to input information or read whatever information you would wish people to receive [and therefore assume as being the truth], you would do it through the bloodstream. (…) By extension, you could load Shakespeare into your bloodstream or the French language if you want to learn French, and the little robots will digest the French language. We will be able to extract souvenirs of deceased people [suppress the memory of dead beloved individuals, the remembrance of dead victims or of dead communities, of dead ethnicities etc.] By 2030, we will be able to inject nanorobots in the bloodstream [Actually, this process is already implemented through air, water, soil and mandatory vaccinations, facial creams etc.] Biotechnologies and Nanorobotics are to the new technological era what plastic was to the digital world, twenty-five years ago”.

Ray Kurzweil, Engineer Director at Alphabet [Google] predicts that by 2030,

“we will be happier, sexier, and more able to express affection to each other. Our brains will be able to connect the cloud, therefore receive emails and pictures directly. Considering that Nanobots [which are partly made of strands of DNA] will be floating in our brains, the next human evolution is equivalent to our ancestors’ tools”.

Along with Larry Page, Google Co-founder, he has also declared that not only will Nanobots increase our logical intelligence, but they will also increase our emotional intelligence:

“We are going to add extra layers of abstractions to our neocortex. Evolution is a spiritual process that will make us more Gods like.”

This is what my fellow compatriot and Silicon Valley’s darling Yuval Noah Hariri calls “the Dataist religion” in his new book “Homo Deus”. As algorithms are already able to track our human uniqueness, they are therefore able to transform it through recurring mental suggestions until Nanobots can operate Nazi sorts of quiet “selektions” between ‘a useful class of servants’ and the dispensable.

In other words, seventy-five years after millions of human beings were taken to death camps on the grounds of a hierarchical ordering on human races; this is now the single human race which is driven at the end of the extermination camp’s train station ramp. On the left side, immortal or unresolved slavery is offered. On the right side, the last destination is the gas chamber of the third Millennium.

In the 21st century, Nanobots are the modern version of zyclon B gas, which will be killing individuals from the most sacred citadel ; their own bloodstream. Time has never had an emancipatory meaning. For the survivors of this Holocaust; this privileged “class of useful servants”, the sublime irony may be that death becomes the unreachable sky limit, with no possible way to ever attain the Greek Elysium or the Shakespearean Elysian fields. However, the likelihood that this “happier, sexier and more Gods like” class of dehumanized tools can question human identity is close to ground zero. Memory suppression annihilates the possibility of establishing any comparing process. “He who controls the present, controls the past, and controls the future”. The Orwellian prediction was a realistic vision. In this respect, the sole purpose of Facebook is to provide the police with the information about an Alpha sum of uniqueness on the scale past totalitarian systems could not have even dreamt of. Alphabet dictates the truth to be disseminated, with the superior paradoxical advantage consisting in blaming the only humanistic alternative to this New World Order.

The use of information to enhance domination goes back to the beginning of humanity itself. As civilizations emerged, propaganda and psychological warfare evolved hand-in-hand with tools (slings, arrows, swords, shields, and articulated language coupled with pictorial then writing communication).

The most recent iteration of western domination takes the form of social media and cyberwarfare where tools are being developed and massively deployed to influence populations and perpetuate indoctrination. By far, the United States holds an uncontested monopoly over the tools of cyberwarfare on his own territory and within his hegemonic sphere of influence worldwide. This totalitarian cyber arsenal is part of the effort aiming at the full implementation of the concocted New World Order, as abundantly described earlier. To manipulate political processes of foreign states, tap into, and exploit global economic forces would redundantly comment on the obvious. U.S. Intelligence Cyber spying programs leaving foreign countries’ fingerprints only emphasize on the degree of determination.

To reassert America’s control over information and the technology used to broker it at a time when both the U.S. dollar and the U.S. economy are crumbling down has become a vital move hoping to hide the stigmas of a decaying totalitarian empire. Although rigorously unsubstantiated as of today, the convenient false narrative of Russia’s interference into the 2016 elections now allows, Jared Cohen, current Google employee and former US State Department staff to propose a US-created and dominated “international” framework regarding cyberconflict. During the 2017 French presidential campaign, similar groundless narrative of “Russian hacking into Macron’s party” was vocally disseminated by the mainstream media and the former Administration including President Hollande and PM Ayrault. As soon as sworn into office in May, Macron however publically admitted the amplitude of the fabricated story during a joint conference with President Putin.

In his recent Op-Ed in the New York Times titled, “How to Prevent a Cyberwar,” Jared Cohen shamelessly states: “The world needs to establish a set of principles to determine the proper conduct of governments regarding cyberconflict. They would dictate how to properly attribute cyberattacks, so that we know with confidence who is responsible, and they would guide how countries should respond.”

Unsurprising comment nominates the U.S. as the best leader to coordinate these ‘ noble’ efforts:

“(    )The United States is uniquely positioned to lead this effort and point the world toward a goal of an enforceable cyberwarfare treaty. Many of the institutions that would be instrumental in informing these principles are based in the United States, including research universities and the technology industry. Part of this effort would involve leading by example, and the United States can and should establish itself as a defender of a free and open internet everywhere.”

Nonetheless, Cohen’s sublime irony was still to come:

(   ) Cyberweapons have already been used by governments to interfere with elections, steal billions of dollars, harm critical infrastructure, censor the press, manipulate public conversations about crucial issues and harass dissidents and journalists. The intensity of cyberconflict around the world is increasing, and the tools are becoming cheaper and more readily available.”

Mr. Cohen obviously forgets to mention that unauthorized, unlimited and unconstitutional military warfare and cyberweapons bear American primary colors. No country in the world can claim such a deplorable privilege, or is it necessary to draw a legitimate analogy between the 20th century Nazi Order that the one that the U.S. have planned to replace?

Is it necessary to mention that Jared Cohen himself was directly involved in joint operations between Google, Facebook, the US State Department and a number of other U.S. tech and media enterprises which before and during 2011, set the stage for the so-called “Arab Spring”? Is it necessary to clarify what kind of operations were backed such as the trainings, funding and activists’ equipment years ahead of the uprisings as well as effective participation in the uprisings themselves, proactive assistance to both protesters and militants everywhere from Libya to Syria and quasi ritual U.S. technique of destabilization, as part of the regime change policy?

One such tool used in these efforts was described in a British “The Independent” article titled, “Google planned to help Syrian rebels bring down Assad regime, leaked Hillary Clinton emails claim,” which would report that:

“(   ) An interactive tool created by Google was designed to encourage Syrian rebels and help bring down the Assad regime, Hillary Clinton’s leaked emails have reportedly revealed. By tracking and mapping defections within the Syrian leadership, it was reportedly designed to encourage more people to defect and ‘give confidence’ to the rebel opposition. (…) The email detailing Google’s defection tracker purportedly came from Jared Cohen, a Clinton advisor until 2010 and now-President of Jigsaw, formerly known as “Google Ideas”; the company’s New York-based policy think tank. (…) In a July 2012 email to members of Clinton’s team, which the WikiLeaks release alleges was later forwarded to the Secretary of State herself, Cohen reportedly said: “My team is planning to launch a tool on Sunday that will publicly track and map the defections in Syria and which parts of the government they are coming from.”

Then what kind of “Cohen’s framework” would prevent the United States from using cyberweaponry over foreign countries with a view to undermining their sovereign rights while spying on their citizenries? What ‘humanistic’ framework would refrain Cohen and the Cabal he represents from plunging all areas of the world including the United States into enduring chaos if necessary to the full implementation of the New World Order ?

What Cohen shows in this ridiculous article is a major weakness and the fear that other countries are now capable of retaliating against the Nazi masterplan of the third Millennium. If my brother has come to look for impunity and a moral absolution, he should only fear G-d and the sick project of playing dice with the Almighty. As for me, human and imperfect I was born. Human and mortal I will stand.

For many uncorrupted ethicists, philosophers and scientists but also for the believers of all faiths, dataism is an attempt to reach ultimate domination over mankind, but at no time could it ever be the religion of the 21st century. Furthermore, from the main postulate it implies arise many ontological questions, the first of which addresses the change in nature of our human identity. Dataism doesn’t promise eternal life, but immortality. Then let’s allow rational thinking to be our guide:

  • As just mentioned, what about the nature of human identity, once free will is suppressed, considering that Nanobots are able to insert any kind of emotion, information ect. through bloodstream?
  • Considering that AI is soon going to be able to suppress the memory of deceased people, logical reasoning concludes that the memory of ‘eliminated’ redundant people is going to be suppressed. Is that what can be called a happier human nature?
  • What happens to exclusive human characteristics which are anticipation, difference (the ability to postpone), and opposition (resilience)? Therefore, what happens to human freedom?
  • Who is deciding what to insert?
  • What happens to believers of all faiths who may not be able to remember their own G-d, thus to worship him?
  • Who will decide which people can reproduce?

My list could go endless.

@Mylene Doublet O’Kane, Sept 2017 – Part 3 to be continued to Part 4 out of 4

Editor’s note : End of Part 3 out of 4

Republishing of the articles is welcomed with reference to TCO.
The views of the authors do not necessarily coincide with the opinion of the editorial board.